Free Essays on Epistomolgy

‘LOGOS’ – means word Epistà §mà § = Knowledge Epistemology = the study of knowledge HOW DO I KNOW FOR SURE? (Contrasted with doxa = which is a belief or mere opinion) (How) can doxa (an opinion) = be Epistà §mà § (knowledge)? Knowledge = justified true belief (universally true). Doxa can be justified belief. 3 necessary conditions for knowledge: 1. Belief – (yours/mine) 2. Truth – (it is true) 3. Justification – (you/me justified in believing the truth) In philosophy there are 2 kinds if knowledge: Knowing How vs. Knowing That To do something â€Å"know-how†.Cannot be fully verbalizedEg:- your own way of doing things. It is not what epistà §mà § refers to. Propositional truth – truth in an idea.(propose – idea, offer)It can be fully verbalized. Declaratives, statements, propositions: the kinds of things we say. 1. Interrogative (question). Is that a door? Are you sure? 2. Explanative (!) What a nice car! Kinds of statements 3. Imperative (order) Shut that door. Each statement supposes that something is true BUT after saying all those statements, the question â€Å"Is that true† doesn’t follow. Invalid. That’s why this cannot apply to epistemology because these 3 statements leave no room for doubt. Already supposes something is true. * Only declarative statement CAN possess â€Å"truth-value†. E.g.: this is door. Difference is, in declarative, you can ask â€Å"Is that true?† therefore declarative. Components of any argument MUST be declarative statements. You cannot order, exclaim, or question within a philosophical argument. One other kind of statement that seems like a declarative statement but it’s not. (But not declarative sentences or â€Å"pseudo-statements† such as: men are from Mars; Women are from Venus (!) Cannot form part of an argument because it is an exaggeration... Free Essays on Epistomolgy Free Essays on Epistomolgy ‘LOGOS’ – means word Epistà §mà § = Knowledge Epistemology = the study of knowledge HOW DO I KNOW FOR SURE? (Contrasted with doxa = which is a belief or mere opinion) (How) can doxa (an opinion) = be Epistà §mà § (knowledge)? Knowledge = justified true belief (universally true). Doxa can be justified belief. 3 necessary conditions for knowledge: 1. Belief – (yours/mine) 2. Truth – (it is true) 3. Justification – (you/me justified in believing the truth) In philosophy there are 2 kinds if knowledge: Knowing How vs. Knowing That To do something â€Å"know-how†.Cannot be fully verbalizedEg:- your own way of doing things. It is not what epistà §mà § refers to. Propositional truth – truth in an idea.(propose – idea, offer)It can be fully verbalized. Declaratives, statements, propositions: the kinds of things we say. 1. Interrogative (question). Is that a door? Are you sure? 2. Explanative (!) What a nice car! Kinds of statements 3. Imperative (order) Shut that door. Each statement supposes that something is true BUT after saying all those statements, the question â€Å"Is that true† doesn’t follow. Invalid. That’s why this cannot apply to epistemology because these 3 statements leave no room for doubt. Already supposes something is true. * Only declarative statement CAN possess â€Å"truth-value†. E.g.: this is door. Difference is, in declarative, you can ask â€Å"Is that true?† therefore declarative. Components of any argument MUST be declarative statements. You cannot order, exclaim, or question within a philosophical argument. One other kind of statement that seems like a declarative statement but it’s not. (But not declarative sentences or â€Å"pseudo-statements† such as: men are from Mars; Women are from Venus (!) Cannot form part of an argument because it is an exaggeration...